MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394949264 · doi:10.6339/24-jds1122

BIE: Binary Image Encoding for the Classification of Tabular Data

2024· article· en· W4394949264 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Data Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEncoding (memory)Pattern recognition (psychology)Convolutional neural networkContextual image classificationBenchmark (surveying)Image (mathematics)Deep learningFeature (linguistics)Field (mathematics)Binary imageImage processingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been remarkable progress in the field of deep learning, particularly in areas such as image classification, object detection, speech recognition, and natural language processing. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have emerged as a dominant model of computation in this domain, delivering exceptional accuracy in image recognition tasks. Inspired by their success, researchers have explored the application of CNNs to tabular data. However, CNNs trained on structured tabular data often yield subpar results. Hence, there has been a demonstrated gap between the performance of deep learning models and shallow models on tabular data. To that end, Tabular-to-Image (T2I) algorithms have been introduced to convert tabular data into an unstructured image format. T2I algorithms enable the encoding of spatial information into the image, which CNN models can effectively utilize for classification. In this work, we propose two novel T2I algorithms, Binary Image Encoding (BIE) and correlated Binary Image Encoding (cBIE), which preserve complex relationships in the generated image by leveraging the native binary representation of the data. Additionally, cBIE captures more spatial information by reordering columns based on their correlation to a feature. To evaluate the performance of our algorithms, we conducted experiments using four benchmark datasets, employing ResNet-50 as the deep learning model. Our results show that the ResNet-50 models trained with images generated using BIE and cBIE consistently outperformed or matched models trained on images created using the previous State of the Art method, Image Generator for Tabular Data (IGTD).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.011
Open science0.0130.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it