MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394950560 · doi:10.1088/1681-7575/ad40af

A proposal for three categories of units within the SI

2024· article· en· W4394950560 on OpenAlex
John H. Lehman, Alan L. Migdall, Julia Scherschligt, Lorne Whitehead

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMetrologia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnits of measurementInternational System of UnitsCLARITYBase (topology)Computer scienceKilogramMeasure (data warehouse)MathematicsDatabaseStatisticsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this letter we examine the organization of the traditional base units and defining constants established in the 2019 redefinition of the international system of units (SI). For the next redefinition of the SI, which will accompany the anticipated redefinition of the second, we propose an organizational change to improve clarity while maintaining practicality. We propose three distinct categories of units: The first category comprises the four base-measurement units: The second, meter, kilogram, and ampere. The second contains physiologically-relevant derived units. The third category contains the remaining units derived from the base units.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.322
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.093 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it