Multi-Task Learning Resource Allocation in Federated Integrated Sensing and Communication Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The future integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) networks is expected to equip with sufficient computation resources. However, current research focuses on single-domain resource allocation in ISAC and computing force networks, leaving the joint optimization of sensing, communication, and computation resource allocation unexplored. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to this problem by deep incorporating computation resources, combined with a federated learning framework, while considering sensing precision and power consumption. Firstly, a multi-objective optimization is designed, involving Cramer-Rao Bound, sum rate of ISAC networks, and power consumption of computing force networks. Subsequently, the multi-objective optimization is transformed into a multi-task learning model. We aim to obtain joint optimization of sensing, communication, and computation resource allocation via deep learning techniques. Towards the multi-task learning model, the multiple-gradient descent algorithm is utilized to obtain the multi-objective optimization. Furthermore, a practical low-complexity the multiple-gradient descent algorithm is developed to reduce the computational cost. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed deep learning algorithms is verified by simulations results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".