Centaur: Robust Multimodal Fusion for Human Activity Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proliferation of IoT and mobile devices equipped with heterogeneous sensors has enabled new applications that rely on the fusion of time-series emitted by sensors with different modalities. While there are promising neural network architectures for multimodal fusion, their performance falls apart quickly in the presence of consecutive missing data and noise across multiple modalities/sensors, the issues that are prevalent in real-world settings. We propose Centaur, a multimodal fusion model for human activity recognition (HAR) that is robust to these data quality issues. Centaur combines a data cleaning module, which is a denoising autoencoder with convolutional layers, and a multimodal fusion module, which is a deep convolutional neural network with the self-attention mechanism to capture cross-sensor correlation. We train Centaur using a stochastic data corruption scheme and evaluate it on five datasets that contain data generated by multiple inertial measurement units. We show that Centaur’s data cleaning module outperforms two state-of-the-art autoencoder-based architectures, and its multimodal fusion module outperforms four strong baselines. Compared to two robust fusion architectures from the related work, Centaur is more robust especially to consecutive missing data that occur in multiple sensor channels, achieving 10.89–16.56% higher accuracy in the HAR task.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".