Crack detection and dimensional assessment using smartphone sensors and deep learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the crucial need for effective crack detection and dimensional assessment in civil infrastructure materials to ensure safety and functionality. It proposes a cost-effective crack detection and dimensional assessment solution by applying state-of-the-art deep learning on smartphone sensor imagery and positioning data. The proposed methodology integrates three-dimensional (3D) data from LiDAR sensors with Mask R-convolutional neural network (CNN) and YOLOv8 object detection networks, for automated crack detection in concrete structures, allowing for accurate measurement of crack dimensions, including length, width, and area. The study finds that YOLOv8 produces superior precision and recall results in crack detection compared to Mask R-CNN. Furthermore, the calculated crack-straight-length closely aligns with the ground-truth straight-length, with an average error of 1.5%. These research contributions include developing a multi-modal solution combining LiDAR observations with image masks for precise 3D crack measurements, establishing a dimensional assessment pipeline to convert segmented cracks into measurements, and comparing state-of-the-art CNN-based networks for crack detection in real-life images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".