MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394966658 · doi:10.5376/tgg.2024.15.0003

GWAS Discovery of Stress Tolerance Trait Genes in Wheat Crops

2024· article· en· W4394966658 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hongpeng Wang, Minghua Li

Bibliographic record

VenueTriticeae Genomics and Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyTraitBiologyGeneAgronomyGeneticsComputer scienceSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significant progress has been made in research on stress tolerance trait genes of wheat crops, which has greatly promoted the development of crop improvement and food security. Through high-throughput sequencing technology and genome-wide association analysis (GWAS), researchers have successfully identified multiple key genes and regulatory networks related to stress response, especially under stress conditions such as drought, salinity, and low temperature. The application of gene editing technologies, such as CRISPR/Cas9, provides new strategies for precisely improving stress tolerance traits. At the same time, the development of phenomics has deepened the understanding of crop stress response mechanisms. Future research will focus on the application of systems biology methods, integrating multi-omics data to reveal complex stress tolerance mechanisms; using precision breeding technology to precisely operate stress tolerance genes ; strengthening research on the interaction between environment and genetics, and exploring the genetic diversity of wild resources. and promote international cooperation and knowledge sharing. These directions will provide a solid scientific basis for cultivating wheat crop varieties with high stress tolerance to cope with climate change and global food security challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTriticeae Genomics and GeneticsSame topicRice Cultivation and Yield ImprovementFrench-language works237,207