MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394968508 · doi:10.61838/kman.jppr.2.2.3

The Impact of a Structured Social Workshop on Risk Behaviors and Mood Regulation

2023· article· en· W4394968508 on OpenAlexaff
Saeed A. Al‐Dossary, Irmak Atak, Neda Atapour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Personality and Psychosomatic Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBehavioral Health and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoodPsychologySocial riskClinical psychologyMedicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a Social Connectedness Workshop in mitigating risk-taking behaviors and improving mood regulation among adults experiencing mild to moderate levels of social disconnection. It hypothesized that increased social connectedness through structured intervention would lead to significant improvements in these psychological domains. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 30 participants, aged 18-45, who were assigned to either an 8-session Social Connectedness Workshop (experimental group) or a control group receiving no intervention. Assessments using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) for risk-taking behaviors and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) for mood regulation were conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and at a three-month follow-up. Data analysis was performed with SPSS-27, employing Analysis of Variance with repeated measurements and Bonferroni post-hoc tests. Participants in the experimental group showed significant reductions in risk-taking behaviors, with mean scores decreasing from 43.99 (SD = 5.44) at baseline to 37.39 (SD = 6.99) at follow-up (p < 0.01). Mood regulation also improved significantly, with mean scores increasing from 82.99 (SD = 13.77) to 90.49 (SD = 13.55) in the same group (p < 0.01). No significant changes were observed in the control group across both variables. The intervention group's results displayed significant time, group, and interaction effects, indicating the workshop's effectiveness in achieving the study's objectives. The Social Connectedness Workshop effectively reduced risk-taking behaviors and enhanced mood regulation among participants, underscoring the importance of social ties and emotional support in psychological well-being. These findings suggest that structured social connectedness interventions can be a valuable component of mental health strategies aimed at reducing risk-taking behaviors and improving mood regulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.546
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Personality and Psychosomatic ResearchSame topicBehavioral Health and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207