MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ROLE OF CLUSTER FORMATIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SPATIAL ECONOMY

2024· article· en· W4394972346 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Pavlo T. Bubenko, Volodymyr V. Volikov

Bibliographic record

VenueMunicipal economy of cities · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDalhousie UniversityEuropean Commission
KeywordsCluster (spacecraft)Economic geographyGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to analysing cluster formations as a new, unique factor in increasing the competitiveness of modern territorial systems. The authors conducted a comprehensive study of the theoretical and methodological foundations of the spatial-cluster organisation of the innovative development of the socio-economic system. We consider various approaches to the study of the essence of clusters to identify their characteristic features and determine the effects generated by them. The article analyses the fundamental scientific works of well-known economists devoted to relevant cluster topics, with a retrospective reflection of the laws and regularities revealed by them on the actual, current field of existing socio-economic problems of the territorial economy. It is noted that, in the conditions of globalisation where market forces dominate, ‘soft’ forms of integration interactions of business entities will be required, so the role of spatially localised forms of integration associations will increase. The mechanism of their emergence and evolution is of fundamental importance for separating clusters of industrial enterprises from other forms of association of economic entities. We highlight the general and specific features of clusters. By a cluster, the authors understand a set of independent, innovatively active organisations connected by territorial proximity and functional dependence. Signs of a cluster are territorial proximity, a critical mass of organisations, a high density of connections between organisations, and a high level of innovative activity. Economic clusters are highly complex multidimensional system objects, so unambiguously assigning them to a specific taxonomic type is impossible. The authors propose a definition of the concept: a cluster is an open complex system with a hierarchical, orderly structure, the basis of which is a voluntary association of firms that are interdependent and, at the same time, retain autonomy and successfully compete with each other, which leads to increased competitiveness not only of its participants but also of a particular territorial unit. We conclude that thanks to the characteristic features of clusters and the synergistic effects that arise in them, the competitiveness of individual cluster participants and the cluster as a whole, as well as the innovative level of development of the territorial system, increases. Keywords: cluster, cluster formations, localised economic system, innovation development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMunicipal economy of citiesSame topicBusiness Strategy and InnovationFrench-language works237,207