Multiparameter shallow-seismic waveform inversion based on the Jensen–Shannon divergence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Seismic full-waveform inversion (FWI) or waveform inversion (WI) has gained extensive attention as a cutting-edge imaging method, which is expected to reveal the high-resolution images of complex geological structures. In this paper, we regard each 1-D signal in the inversion system as a 1-D probability distribution, then use the Jensen–Shannon divergence from information theory to measure the discrepancy between the predicted and observed signals, and finally implement a novel 2-D multiparameter shallow-seismic WI (MSWI). Essentially, the novel approach achieves an implicit weighting along the time-axis for each 1-D adjoint source defined by the classical WI (CWI), thus enhancing the extra illumination for a deeper medium compared with the CWI. By evaluating the inversion results of the two-layer model and fault model, the reconstruction accuracy for S-wave velocity and density of the new method is increased by about 30 and 20 per cent compared with that of the CWI under the same conditions, respectively. The reconstruction performance for P-wave velocity of these two methods is almost equal. In addition, the new 2-D MSWI is also resilient to white Gaussian noise in the data. Numerically, the inversion system has almost the strongest sensitivities to the S-wave velocity and density, performing the poorest sensitivity to the P-wave velocity. Finally, we test the novel method with a detection case for a power tunnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".