MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394976629 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae067.01119

1119 Validation of a Portable Sleep Electroencephalography Device in Good Sleepers and People with Sleep Apnea

2024· article· en· W4394976629 on OpenAlexaff
Malika Lanthier, Micheal-Christopher Foti, Caitlin Higginson, Paniz Tavakoli, Defne Oksit, L. Bryan Ray, Stuart Fogel, Rébecca Robillard

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health CentreÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographySleep (system call)Sleep apneaAudiologyApneaMedicinePsychologyPolysomnographyAnesthesiaPsychiatryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Sleep wearable restricted to accelerometry or heart rate monitoring have proved to be helpful to delineate sleep-wake profiles outside of the laboratory environment, but have limited accuracy and only provide indirect estimations of sleep and wake states. This study aimed to assess the validity of a novel electroencephalography headband for ambulatory sleep monitoring as compared to standard polysomnography in good sleepers and individuals with sleep apnea. Methods Forty-seven adult males and females from the community took part to this study. This includes a preliminary sample of eight individuals with sleep apnea detected through level 1 polysomnography. All participants underwent one night of in-laboratory sleep recording with the portable EEG headband (MUSE-S, Interaxon) and simultaneous standard polysomnography (Embla N7000/RemLogic, Natus). The Muse-S headband is a commercially available consumer headband with 7 EEG sensors: 2 on the forehead, 2 behind the ears, and 3 reference sensors. MUSE-S data was scored using an automated sleep staging algorithm. Polysomnography data was scored by an independent registered technologist who was blinded to the MUSE-S algorithm-based scoring. Results In the overall sample, the accuracy of the Muse-S relative to standard polysomnography ranged between 88% and 96% across all sleep stages, with a sensitivity of 79% to 92%, and a specificity of 90% to 99%. Cohen’s Kappa for all sleep stages combined was 0.76 (CI:0.75-0.76). Analyses per sleep stages showed that Cohen’s Kappa scores were in the fair agreement range for NREM 1 sleep (K=0.41, CI:0.39-0.43), increased to the substantial agreement range for both NREM 2 (K=0.75, CI:0.74-0.75) and NREM3 sleep (K=0.77, CI:0.76-0.77), and further increased to the near perfect agreement range for REM sleep (K=0.85, CI:0.85-0.86) and wake (K=0.84, CI: 0.83-0.84). Similar results were obtained in the subgroup with sleep apnea (overall K= 0.87, CI:0.85-0.88; NREM 1 K=0.33, CI:0.28-0.38; NREM 2 K=0.72, CI:0.70-0.73; NREM3 K=0.81, CI:0.79-0.79; REM K=0.80, CI:0.78-0.82) and wake (K=0.86, CI:0.85-0.88). Conclusion Portable EEG-based sleep monitoring with the MUSE-S shows good validity for sleep macroarchitecture variables relative to standard polysomnography. Fair to near perfect concordance was observed across sleep stages in a diverse sample of good sleepers and people with sleep disorders. Support (if any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207