MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394977188 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0609

0609 Improved Sleep Quality with Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure Enhanced Mandibular Advancement Device in OSA

2024· article· en· W4394977188 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sat Sharma, Rami Al Metwali, Antonella Conflitti, Hilary Reiter

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sleep & Circadian Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContinuous positive airway pressureAirwaySleep (system call)Obstructive sleep apneaSleep qualityPositive airway pressureAnesthesiaInsomnia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction The ExVent is an optional accessory to the O2Vent Optima mandibular advancement device (MAD) and provides oral Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP). Oral EPAP with the ExVent is designed to provide upper airway support via similar mechanisms of action of nasal EPAP devices in commercial distribution, e.g., passive dilatation of the airway, which reduces flow limitation. The oral EPAP provided by the ExVent accessory augments the OSA therapy provided by the O2Vent Optima. Long-term benefits on sleep quality and daytime functioning with combination therapy have not been studied. Methods We conducted a retrospective survey of all patients who were prescribed O2Vent Optima mandibular device and oral expiratory positive pressure accessory in Canada and Australia from 2019 to November, 2022. A study investigator contacted the participants via telephone and obtained consent to participate. Data collected included: demographics, duration of use, frequency of use, daytime sleepiness, bed partner reported snoring, sleep satisfaction, morning and daytime functioning, daytime tiredness/fatigue and bed partner’s sleep. Results Out of the patient data base of 480 subject, 168 (35%) participated. 31 (18%) stopped using the appliance. Out of 137 (81%) subjects, 118 (86%) were still using the ExVent Accessory, 92% medium strength (Yellow). Age 53±7 yrs, 76% Male. Data showed mean duration of use 2.7±0.9 years, mean frequency of use - most nights (91%), use >6 hours/night (86%). Sleep quality was compared from before to after therapy. Daytime sleepiness improved to none/mild from moderate/severe (96%). Bed partner reported snoring improved to none/mild from moderate/severe (94%). Participants slept very well/reasonably well compared to not well/not well at all (82%), woke up more refreshed most mornings compared to some/rare mornings (86%), functioned very well/reasonably well to not well/not well at all (88%), felt fatigue and tiredness none of the time compared to some/all the time (83%), bed partner’s sleep interruption was none/some of the time from all the time (95%). Conclusion This retrospective study demonstrated that majority of subjects prescribed EPAP enhanced MAD with O2Vent Optima and ExVent were compliant, experienced improved sleep quality, daytime functioning and their partner’s sleep was significantly less interrupted. Support (if any) Centre for Sleep and Chronobiology, Toronto, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207