Exploration of the Magnetic Properties of ZrCo:Co Bilayer Films: Effects of the Thickness of the Co Layer on the Anisotropy and Magnetic Interaction Parameters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis of ZrCo:Co films with varying Co layer thicknesses reveals distinctive magnetic properties and behaviors. Despite significant roughness, the films exhibit uniform surfaces and complete crystallization at the nanoscale. Magnetic studies show positive remanence anisotropy, decreased coercivity Hc and remanent magnetization Mr with increasing film thickness, along with a linear correlation between thickness and surface roughness. Exchange interactions between grains and layers influence magnetic properties. Ferromagnetic resonance analysis demonstrates a direct correlation between film thickness and magnetization orientation preference, notably at δ Co = 200 nm. These findings underscore the critical role of film thickness in determining microstructural and magnetic properties, offering insights for magnetic device and nanotechnology applications. Understanding these relationships may lead to thickness‐tunable magnetic materials. This study uniquely explores ZrCo:Co films, delving into how their magnetic properties vary with Co layer thickness, revealing novel magnetic behaviors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it