MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394978725 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae067.01122

1122 A Deep Learning Model for Inferring Sleep Stage from a Flexible Wireless Dual Sensor Wearable System Without EEG

2024· article· en· W4394978725 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. Andrew Zhang, Chunlin Li, Yuzhi Tang, Alex He-Mo, Nasim Montazeri Ghahjaverestan, Maged Goubran, Andrew Lim

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWearable computerElectroencephalographySleep (system call)Computer scienceDual (grammatical number)Artificial intelligenceDeep learningSleep StagesWirelessReal-time computingMachine learningPolysomnographyPsychologyEmbedded systemNeuroscienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction In-lab polysomnography (PSG) is costly and difficult to scale due to a need for specialized personnel for data acquisition and annotation. Numerous novel wearable devices without electroencephalography (EEG) have been developed to improve scalability of data acquisition. However, validated automated approaches to data annotation, including sleep staging are needed. Here, we apply deep learning approaches to the problem of sleep staging using data from the ANNE One (Sibel Health, Evanston, IL), a minimally intrusive flexible wireless dual sensor system measuring chest electrocardiography (ECG), triaxial accelerometry, and temperature, and finger photoplethysmography (PPG). Methods We obtained wearable sensor recordings from 281 adults undergoing concurrent clinical polysomnography at a tertiary care sleep lab. PSG recordings were scored according to AASM criteria. PSG and wearable sensor data were automatically aligned using their ECG signals with alignment confirmed by visual inspection. We trained a neural-network model to predict both 3-class (Wake, NREM, REM) and 2-class (Wake, Sleep) sleep stage classifications using a randomly selected 85% of the recordings and tested the model on the remaining recordings. We applied the model to ambulatory wearable sensor recordings from 233 older adults at risk for dementia. Our neural-network employed a convolutional-encoder and autoregressive-decoder architecture. In addition to time domain signals, we also engineered frequency domain features as well as selected scalar and metadata features as input to our model to improve performance. Ensembling of model variants was performed. Results Our approach achieved a 2-class macro-F1 of 0.718 with a sensitivity of 0.760 and specificity of 0.763 and a 3-class macro-F1 of 0.585 (wake precision 0.564 accuracy 0.745; NREM precision 0.886 accuracy 0.634; REM precision 0.258 accuracy 0.671). Our feature engineering and training techniques offered a 9% performance improvement from the time domain signals only baseline given the same neural network architecture, while ensembling different model variants offered a further 4% performance improvement. Conclusion A deep learning model can infer sleep stage from an EEG-less flexible wireless system and can be successfully applied to data from older community-dwelling adults at high risk for dementia. Support (if any) The Centre for Aging and Brain Health Innovation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, National Institute on Aging

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207