MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394980106 · doi:10.1093/brain/awae123

Spatial enrichment and genomic analyses reveal the link of <i>NOMO1</i> with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

2024· article· en· W4394980106 on OpenAlexaff
Jingyan Guo, Linya You, Yu Zhou, Jiali Hu, Jiahao Li, Wanli Yang, Tang Xuelin, Yi‐Min Sun, Yuqi Gu, Yi Dong, Xi Chen, Christine Sato, Lorne Zinman, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Jian Wang, Yan Chen, Ming Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersFundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Science and Technology
KeywordsAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisBiologyNeuroscienceTranscriptomeDorsolateral prefrontal cortexHuman brainMotor neuronPrefrontal cortexGeneGene expressionGeneticsDiseaseMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a severe motor neuron disease with uncertain genetic predisposition in most sporadic cases. The spatial architecture of cell types and gene expression are the basis of cell-cell interactions, biological function and disease pathology, but are not well investigated in the human motor cortex, a key ALS-relevant brain region. Recent studies indicated single nucleus transcriptomic features of motor neuron vulnerability in ALS motor cortex. However, the brain regional vulnerability of ALS-associated genes and the genetic link between region-specific genes and ALS risk remain largely unclear. Here, we developed an entropy-weighted differential gene expression matrix-based tool (SpatialE) to identify the spatial enrichment of gene sets in spatial transcriptomics. We benchmarked SpatialE against another enrichment tool (multimodal intersection analysis) using spatial transcriptomics data from both human and mouse brain tissues. To investigate regional vulnerability, we analysed three human motor cortex and two dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tissues for spatial enrichment of ALS-associated genes. We also used Cell2location to estimate the abundance of cell types in ALS-related cortex layers. To dissect the link of regionally expressed genes and ALS risk, we performed burden analyses of rare loss-of-function variants detected by whole-genome sequencing in ALS patients and controls, then analysed differential gene expression in the TargetALS RNA-sequencing dataset. SpatialE showed more accurate and specific spatial enrichment of regional cell type markers than multimodal intersection analysis in both mouse brain and human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Spatial transcriptomic analyses of human motor cortex showed heterogeneous cell types and spatial gene expression profiles. We found that 260 manually curated ALS-associated genes are significantly enriched in layer 5 of the motor cortex, with abundant expression of upper motor neurons and layer 5 excitatory neurons. Burden analyses of rare loss-of-function variants in Layer 5-associated genes nominated NOMO1 as a novel ALS-associated gene in a combined sample set of 6814 ALS patients and 3324 controls (P = 0.029). Gene expression analyses in CNS tissues revealed downregulation of NOMO1 in ALS, which is consistent with a loss-of-function disease mechanism. In conclusion, our integrated spatial transcriptomics and genomic analyses identified regional brain vulnerability in ALS and the association of a layer 5 gene (NOMO1) with ALS risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207