MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of temperature on the behaviour and physiology of Atlantic salmon (Salmo Salar) on a commercial farm

2024· article· en· W4394981802 on OpenAlexaff
Jennie Korus, Ramón Filgueira, Jon Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueAquaculture · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalmoBiologyFisheryZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>Ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commercial Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) farms face challenges under climate change, as rising sea temperatures and higher variability in weather patterns can lead to thermal stress events, compromising fish health, and resulting in lower production efficiency. Temperature plays a critical role in influencing the physiological and behavioural response of salmon under stressful conditions and effective farm management requires a nuanced comprehension of its function to adjust farming practices and minimize further stress. Two types of biologgers, measuring external acceleration, depth, heart rate, and temperature were surgically implanted for 245 days to explore the effects of the thermal response of Atlantic salmon during a standard production cycle. Apparent heart rate scope and Arrhenius breakpoint temperature were used to estimate the optimal temperature and both methods resulted in an estimate of 12.7 °C. There was a reduction in apparent heart rate scope at temperatures below 2 °C and >19 °C suggesting proximity to limits of thermal stress. The use of biologgers facilitates direct observations in commercial operations, providing essential information for aquaculture management. These findings contribute to a holistic understanding of the effect of temperature influencing Atlantic salmon physiology and behaviour on aquaculture farms, bridging the gap between controlled laboratory studies and real-world commercial operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAquacultureSame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207