MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394983157 · doi:10.34028/iajit/21/3/5

FPGA based Flexible Implementation of Light Weight Inference on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

2024· article· en· W4394983157 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shefa Dawwd

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Arab Journal of Information Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayConvolutional neural networkInferenceComputer scienceComputer architectureDeep neural networksArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkParallel computingEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Standard Convolution (StdConv) is the main technique used in the state of the art Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs). Fewer computations are achieved if Depthwise Separable Convolution technique (SepConv) is used as an alternative. A crucial issue in many applications like smart cameras and autonomous vehicles where low latency is essential stems from deploying a lightweight and low cost inference models. An acceptable accuracy should be kept with tolerable computations and memory access load. A flexible architecture for different DCNN convolution types and models is proposed. The flexibility comes from the sharing of one memory access unit with different types of layers regardless of the selected kernel size, by multiplying each weight vector by local operators with variant aperture. Moreover, one depthwise computation unit can be used for both standard and pointwise layers. The learnable parameters are quantized to 8-bits fixed point representation and that gives very limited reduction of accuracy and a considerable reduction of the Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) resources. To reduce processing time, inter layer parallel computations are performed. The experiment is conducted by using grey scale ORL database with shallow Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and the colored Canadian Institute for Advanced Research 10 classes (CIFAR-10) database with DCNN, and a comparable accuracies of 93% and 85.7% are achieved respectively using very low cost of Spartan 3E and moderate cost of zynq FPGA platforms

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Arab Journal of Information TechnologySame topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207