Characterization of a novel zebrafish model of <i>MTMR5</i> -associated CMT4B3
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Biallelic loss of expression/function variants in MTMR5 cause the inherited peripheral neuropathy Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Type 4B3. There is an incomplete understanding of the disease pathomechanism(s) underlying CMT4B3, and despite its severe clinical presentation, currently no disease modifying therapies. A key barrier to the study of CMT4B3 is the lack of pre-clinical models that recapitulate the clinical and pathologic features of the disease. To address this barrier, we generated a zebrafish CRISPR/Cas9 mutant line with a full gene deletion of mtmr5. Resulting homozygous deletion zebrafish are born at normal Mendelian ratios and have preserved motor function. However, starting by 14 day-post-fertilization, mutant zebrafish develop obvious morphometric changes in head size and brain volume. These changes are accompanied at the pathological level by abnormal axon outgrowths and by the presence of dysmyelination, changes reminiscent of the nerve pathology in human CMT4B3. Overall, our mtmr5 zebrafish mirror genetic, clinical, and pathologic features of human CMT4B3. As such, it represents a first pre-clinical model to phenocopy the disease, and an ideal tool for future studies on disease pathomechanism(s) and therapy development. Summary Statement We created a novel zebrafish mtmr5/sbf1 mutant model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 4B3 that recapitulates key features of the human disorder and provides the first in vivo model for therapy development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".