MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394987503 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102132

A systematic review of big data innovations in smart grids

2024· review· en· W4394987503 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity Canada West
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataSmart gridComputer scienceData scienceContext (archaeology)AnalyticsData analysisEnergy managementElectricityEnergy consumptionSystems engineeringData miningEnergy (signal processing)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple industries have been revolutionized by the incorporation of data science advancements into intelligent environment technologies, specifically in the context of smart grids. Smart grids offer a dynamic and efficient framework for the management and optimization of electricity generation, distribution, and consumption, thanks to developments in big data analytics. This review delves into the integration of Smart Grid applications and Big Data analytics by reviewing 25 papers screened with PRISMA standard. The paper matter encompasses critical domains including adaptive energy management, canonical correlation analysis, and novel methodologies including blockchain and machine learning. The paper emphasizes contributions to energy efficiency, security, and sustainability by means of a rigorous methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it