MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394993519 · doi:10.30683/1927-7229.2024.13.01

Chemically Induced Brain Cancer in Sprague-Dawley Rats: Changed Lipidomics Mimics the Human Conditions

2024· article· en· W4394993519 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrea Leškaničová, Patrik Šimko, Marián Babinčák, Alžbeta Blichárová, Martin Kertys, Jozef Kostolný, Denisa Maceková, Terézia Kisková

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipidomicsCancerMedicineNeuroscienceChemistryInternal medicinePsychologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malignant gliomas are one of the most treatment-refractory cancers. Development of resistance to chemo- and radiotherapies contributes to these tumors’ aggressive phenotypes. Elevated lipid levels in gliomas have been reported for the last 50 years. However, the molecular mechanisms of how tumor tissues obtain lipids and utilize them are not well understood.In our study, 48.6% of phosphatidylcholines were significantly changed during an early stage of brain cancer in females, and 66.2% in males. As for lysophosphatidylcholines 57.1% metabolites were significantly changed in female, and 64.3% in male rats. We observed the most interesting results in the group of sphingomyelins, where 85.8% metabolites were significantly elevated during brain cancer. According to VIP projection, the most important metabolites were: PC ae C40:3, PC ae C38:1, PC ae C30:1, PC ae C38:3, PC ae C44:3, PC aa C40:2, PC aa C42:0, PC ae C30:2, SM C20:2, PC aa C42:1 in females, and PC ae C38:1, PC ae C40:3, PC ae C30:1, PC ae C42:1, SM C20:2, PC aa C34:4, PC ae C38:4, PC aa C32:2, PC aa C38:5, lysoPC a C14:0. The identification of lipid biomarkers during the early stage of cancer could improve patient prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical OncologySame topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFrench-language works237,207