MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395000002 · doi:10.47392/irjaeh.2024.0137

An Automated Billing System for Smart Shopping Using Internet of Things

2024· article· en· W4395000002 on OpenAlex
V. Santhosh, D Gokulakrishnan, Sujit Purushothaman, Su. Suganthi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer scienceThe InternetComputer securityWorld Wide WebInternet privacy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shopping malls can be crowded, making long checkout lines frustrating. This proposal outlines a "smart cart" system to streamline the billing process. The trolley has a RFID reader and camera to read the tags and capture images respectively. This trolley has two more cameras at two sides of the trolley to capture the images of the objects in the rack. This can accurately detect the objects and later the product has entered into the cart. The main objective of this project is to reduce the time required for this Accounting system at bill counters. If you want to remove a product you added, you will need to rescan the product. In case the object is not detected by the barcode then the camera attached to the RFID reader captures the images of the product and stores to cart using the Database. This is done using a smart shopping system based on RFID. Items that are put in a smart shopping cart are read one by one and the bill is generated and displayed. After completion of shopping, customers can exit the shop with their bills deducted automatically from their e-Wallet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it