Quantum geometrodynamics revived: II. Hilbert space of positive definite metrics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper represents the second in a series of works aimed at reinvigorating the quantum geometrodynamics program. Our approach introduces a lattice regularization of the hypersurface deformation algebra, such that each lattice site carries a set of canonical variables given by the components of the spatial metric and the corresponding conjugate momenta. In order to quantize this theory, we describe a representation of the canonical commutation relations that enforces the positivity of the operators <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="true">^</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> </mml:msup> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for all choices of s . Moreover, symmetry of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="true">^</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="true">^</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>a</mml:mi> <mml:mi>b</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> is ensured. This reflects the physical requirement that the spatial metric should be a positive definite, symmetric tensor. To achieve this end, we resort to the Cholesky decomposition of the spatial metric into upper triangular matrices with positive diagonal entries. Moreover, our Hilbert space also carries a representation of the vielbein fields and naturally separates the physical and gauge degrees of freedom. Finally, we introduce a generalization of the Weyl quantization for our representation. We want to emphasize that our proposed methodology is amenable to applications in other fields of physics, particularly in scenarios where the configuration space is restricted by complicated relationships among the degrees of freedom.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".