MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395001749 · doi:10.21037/tlcr-24-117

The evolving treatment landscape for BRAF-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

2024· editorial· en· W4395001749 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Dankner, Jennifer Maxwell, April A. N. Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Lung Cancer Research · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMelanoma and MAPK Pathways
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerComputational biologyBioinformaticsCancer researchOncologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a subgroup of lung cancers that harbors specific molecular activations, and is responsive to targeted therapies.Indeed, EGFR and ALK-inhibitors are approved in the first-line setting for NSCLC with EGFR and ALK driver alterations (1).In these subtypes of NSCLC, targeted therapies yield significant improvement in objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to chemotherapy (1).For other oncogenic drivers in NSCLC, such as BRAF, HER2, MET, RET, ROS1, KRAS and NTRK, targeted therapies are also approved on the basis of single-arm studies (1).Herein we will discuss the implications of the recently published phase 2 PHAROS clinical trial, that evaluated the efficacy of encorafenib and binimetinib for the treatment of BRAF mutant NSCLC (2).BRAF is a kinase that signals in the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (3).BRAF mutations confer constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway resulting in cell proliferation and tumorigenesis.BRAF mutations are found in 3-5% of NSCLC (4), and can be grouped into three classes based upon molecular characteristics.Class 1 BRAF mutations occur at the V600 residue and signal as constitutively active monomers in a RAS-independent manner (3).BRAF non-V600 mutations can be further classified as RAS-independent active dimers with intermediate to high kinase activity (Class 2), and RAS-dependent kinase-impaired dimers (Class 3) (3).Class 1 BRAF mutations make up the majority of oncogenic BRAF mutations in most cancer types.However, Class 1 mutations only comprise 33-50% of all oncogenic BRAF mutations in NSCLC (5).To date, there are only approved targeted therapies for Class 1 BRAF mutant cancers (6).In NSCLC, all classes of BRAF mutations have been reported as a negative prognostic factor compared to BRAF wildtype (WT) NSCLC (7-9).BRAF inhibitors were first studied for Class 1 BRAF mutant melanoma, demonstrating impressive response rates but were associated with rapid resistance largely due to MAPK pathway reactivation.Indeed, single-agent BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib or dabrafenib) have elicited ORR of 48-53% and PFS of 5.1-6.8months in melanoma (10-12).Due to MAPK pathway reactivation and the development of rapid resistance with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0150.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTranslational Lung Cancer ResearchSame topicMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysFrench-language works237,207