MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395010251 · doi:10.20527/jcae.v6i3.1825

PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN INTERAKTIF TERINTEGRASI ETNOSAINS UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI SAINS DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK PADA MATERI HIDROLISIS GARAM

2024· article· id· W4395010251 on OpenAlexaff
Nurul Azkia, Muhammad Kusasi, Syahmani Syahmani

Bibliographic record

VenueJCAE (Journal of Chemistry And Education) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSTEM Education
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pengembangan media pembelajaran interaktif terintegrasi etnosains perlu dilakukan karena media jenis ini belum tersedia, terutama pada materi hidrolisis garam. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kelayakan (validitas, kepraktisan, dan keefektifan) media pembelajaran interaktif menggunakan terintegrasi etnosains untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi sains dan motivasi belajar peserta didik. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain model penelitian pengembangan 4D (Define, Design, Developmet, Disseminate). Uji coba media pembelajaran dilakukan di Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 3 Martapura tahun ajaran 2021/2022. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengembangan media pembelajaran berdasarkan pada kriteria: (1) Validitas; ditinjau dari aspek isi, penyajian, bahasa, dan media memperoleh skor rata-rata 95,32 (sangat valid). (2) Kepraktisan, ditinjau dari hasil keterbacaan media pembelajaran pada uji perseorangan sebesar 4,08 (baik) dan uji kelompok kecil sebesar 4,32 (sangat baik), Hasil angket repon peserta didik adalah 3,9 (baik), dan hasil observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran adalah 4,51 (sangat baik), (3) Keefektifan, ditinjau dari peningkatan kemampuan literasi sains dengan skor N-gain 0,49 (sedang) dan motivasi belajar dengan skor N-gain 0,61 (sedang). Dengan demikian, media pembelajaran interaktif terintegrasi etnosains pada materi hidrolisis garam layak digunakan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi sains dan motivasi belajar peserta didik pada pembelajaran kimia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCAE (Journal of Chemistry And Education)Same topicSTEM EducationFrench-language works237,207