MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395010606 · doi:10.3390/su16083461

Advancing Spatial Drought Forecasts by Integrating an Improved Outlier Robust Extreme Learning Machine with Gridded Data: A Case Study of the Lower Mainland Basin, British Columbia, Canada

2024· article· en· W4395010606 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainability · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutlierExtreme learning machineMainlandStructural basinClimatologyData miningComputer scienceMeteorologyArtificial intelligenceGeographyMachine learningCartographyGeologyGeomorphologyArchaeologyArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Droughts have extensive consequences, affecting the natural environment, water quality, public health, and exacerbating economic losses. Precise drought forecasting is essential for promoting sustainable development and mitigating risks, especially given the frequent drought occurrences in recent decades. This study introduces the Improved Outlier Robust Extreme Learning Machine (IORELM) for forecasting drought using the Multivariate Standardized Drought Index (MSDI). For this purpose, four observation stations across British Columbia, Canada, were selected. Precipitation and soil moisture data with one up to six lags are utilized as inputs, resulting in 12 variables for the model. An exhaustive analysis of all potential input combinations is conducted using IORELM to identify the best one. The study outcomes emphasize the importance of incorporating precipitation and soil moisture data for accurate drought prediction. IORELM shows promising results in drought classification, and the best input combination was found for each station based on its results. While high Area Under Curve (AUC) values across stations, a Precision/Recall trade-off indicates variable prediction tendencies. Moreover, the F1-score is moderate, meaning the balance between Precision, Recall, and Classification Accuracy (CA) is notably high at specific stations. The results show that stations near the ocean, like Pitt Meadows, have higher predictability up to 10% in AUC and CA compared to inland stations, such as Langley, which exhibit lower values. These highlight geographic influence on model performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it