Deep-learning viscoelastic seismic inversion for mapping subsea permafrost
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Marine seismic surveys can be used to map ice-bearing subsea permafrost on a large scale. However, current seismic processing technologies have limited capacity to image permafrost distribution at depth, mainly due to the low sensitivity of primary reflections and refractions to the velocity inversion found at the base of permafrost. Guided waves and multiples are more sensitive to the velocity variations below the top of permafrost, but they remain challenging to use in physics-based inversion approaches. A deep-learning-based seismic inversion has the potential to improve seismic imaging below the top of permafrost by automatically extracting information from all wave modes. We develop a multi-input neural network (NN) to estimate seismic velocities from marine seismic data. The network is trained on synthetic data generated from the representative distributions of the seismic properties of subsea permafrost. We find that our network can image large velocity contrasts and reversals in depth, typical of subsea permafrost. We use our network to estimate the P- and S-wave velocity and Q-factor models from a seismic line in the Beaufort Sea. The NN indicates highly discontinuous subsea permafrost with variable thickness in the area. Our work shows that deep-learning-based seismic inversion could become a cost-effective technology to map the distribution of subsea permafrost on a large scale and, more generally, high-velocity geologic layers located in shallow waters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".