Formation and growth of wipe blockages due to a vertical obstruction in sewers: Experimental analysis to policy and management strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Improper disposal of wipes results in significant sewer blockages, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the formation and growth of wipe blockages and their backwater effect in sewers have not been studied. This study employed a vertical rod to simulate sewer obstructions such as tree root intrusion in sewers. Stochastic interactions among wipes, turbulent flow, and the obstruction were experimentally studied in a circular pipe (diameter D = 25 cm), with systematic variations in flow Froude number (Fr), wipe length (L), flow depth (H), submerged rod length (hrod), and rod diameter (drod). It was found that the mean area ratio of wipes (ratio of projected area in water to original surface area of the wipe) ranged from 0.14 to 0.30, indicating the distorted shapes in water. The entrapment probability P (ratio of entrapped to released wipes) for a single wipe was closely correlated with Fr, H/D, L/H, drod/H, and hrod/H, with a maximum value of 0.90. With the increase in the number of wipes released, the influence of the obstruction on wipe accumulation processes became negligible. New equations were developed for characterizing entrapment probability, blockage length, and backwater rise, which can be used to predict the development of wipe blockages and sewage levels. Based on the research findings, policy and management strategies were proposed for wipe blockage reduction in sewers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".