MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395015645 · doi:10.1093/mictod/qaae007

Mary Ann Allard Booth (1843–1922): America's First Woman Microscopist

2024· article· en· W4395015645 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy Today · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

America's first professional female microscopist (Figure 1).She began explorations in microscopy in 1877, maintained a sales catalog of skillfully mounted microscope slides for over thirty years, and gained respect as a proficient photomicrographer among her colleagues.Booth's knowledge of microscopy led her to become the microscopy section editor for the magazine The Observer and Practical Microscopy [1].She was also a regular contributor to The American Monthly Journal of Microscopy, beginning with its first issue in January 1880.In 1889, she was elected to the executive committee of the American Microscopical Society [2].Mary Ann Booth traveled about the northeastern United States and Canada, lecturing about photomicrography, illustrating the presentations with projected lantern slides of her making.Most often, she was a guest of scientific societies, where she exhibited trays of microscope slides from her sales catalog (Figure 2).Mary Ann Booth was also a member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and regularly attended its conferences.Internationally, Booth was elected a fellow of England's Royal Microscopical Society and the Royal Photographic Society of London [3].Few women of her time can claim standing in these nineteenth-century male-dominated organizations.At the 1884-1885 New Orleans World Industrial and Cotton Centennial Exposition, Mary Ann Booth was honored with a bronze plaque for her high-quality entomological microscope slides.At the St. Louis Exposition in 1904, she received a Medal of Accomplishment for working to advance the field of microscopy [4,5].The high quality of Mary Ann Booth's slides still captures recognition in the demanding environment of contemporary microscopy.In 2019, Mary Ann Booth's slide of cleaned Polycystina tests (cage-like structures) from Barbados won an honorable mention in Nikon's Small World International Photomicrography Competition (Figure 3).Mary Ann Booth considered a photomicrograph of a flea to be her most publicly notable achievement.During an interview with the Boston Globe, she stated that the flea picture was sent to U.S. Surgeon General Rupert Blue in 1910 while he was in California working to forestall another outbreak of bubonic plague.Blue used Booth's flea photograph in a government brochure to educate the public about rats, sanitation, and bubonic plague (Figure 4).Mary Ann Booth signed the back of the photograph along with comments written in her hand.The

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it