Ehrlichia canis Infection Induced Chronic Kidney Disease in a Labrador Retriever and Its Management: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic kidney disease is irreversible, progressive and most common form of kidney disease in dogs.Canine ehrlichiosis is caused by gram negative intracellular bacteria Ehrlichia canis.Case Presentation: A 7-year old Labrador retriever male dog weighing around 35 kg was presented to the Madras Veterinary College Teaching Hospital with a history of inappetence, vomiting, polyuria and polydipsia from fifteen days.The dog was fully vaccinated and dewormed.On general clinical examination, all vital parameters were within normal range except elevated temperature (103.8°F).The hematological findings revealed mild thrombocytopenia and hypochromasia.The serum biochemistry revealed increased creatinine level (3.68 mg/dl).The blood Case Study pressure was measured using Doppler device which revealed secondary hypertension.A blood smear examination was found to be negative.Case Discussion: The animal was treated for chronic kidney failure.Even then animal was going down and not taking feed.The blood sample was sent for Molecular PCR which confirmed presence of Ehrlichia canis.Then animal was treated for Canine Monocytic Ehrlichiosis to control Ehrlichia canis induced renal failure.Then there was little progress in condition of the animal.The animal was maintained with a renal diet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".