Bio-economic Model of Halal Goat Production System based on Experimentally Comparing Feeding with Madre de Cacao and/or with IPIL-IPIL (Maguindanao Province, Philippines)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study was conducted to develop a bio-economic model of Halal goat production in Maguindanao, Philippines to serve as model to Muslim and non-Muslim goat raisers.Nineteen viable cooperatives in the province of Maguindanao were chosen as beneficiaries of the program.Model development, validation and use were done by adopting the STELLA version 4.0.1 computer software program.Interventions derived from the model were tested in the field.Experimental goats were stalled in pens, subjected under two treatments and a Control, and replicated in a Original Research ArticleUndong et al.; AJRAVS, 5(2): 79-84, 2022; Article no.AJRAVS.8348680 completely randomized design.Descriptive statistics such as frequency and standard deviation were used.Analysis of variance (ANOVA) at 1% confidence level was also employed to determine the degree of significance of the observed differences among treatments.A total of eighteen (18) Halal goats with weight ranging from 10.0 -11.0 kg were used in the field test.They were stall-fed for 90 days with the following treatments: Control (100% Guinea grass), Treatment 2 (50% Guinea grass + 50% Madre de cacao), and Treatment 3 (50% Guinea grass + 25% Ipil-ipil + 25% Madre de cacao).Water and granulated salt were also provided.Dry matter, total digestible nutrients and crude protein contents of Guinea grass, Madre de cacao and Ipil-ipil used in the feeding experiment were analyzed in the laboratory adopting the AOAC method.Growth was determined based on average daily gain in weight among experimental goats.Experimental animals subjected to Treatment 3 performed better than those in the Control and Treatment 2. Results reveal that a combination of Guinea grass, Ipil-ipil and Madre de cacao is still the most practical option in intensive goat feeding management.The study also proved that baseline model developed could be used as tool for Halal goat production system in the province of Maguindanao.Thus, modelling can be used to reduce number of treatments and built-in cost associated with the experimentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".