MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395026332 · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101804

Mental health outcomes among urban public transport workers: A systematic literature review

2024· article· en· W4395026332 on OpenAlex
Boris Cendales, Viviola Gómez Ortíz, Sergio A. Useche, Leonor Cedillo, Daryl Stephenson, Paul Landsbergis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport & Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicWorkplace Health and Well-being
Canadian institutionsCanada Auto Workers
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthSystematic reviewPublic transportPublic healthEnvironmental healthBusinessPsychologyEnvironmental planningMEDLINEMedicineGeographyPolitical scienceTransport engineeringNursingPsychiatryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although abundant evidence suggests that Urban Public Transport (UPT) workers are at high risk of poor mental health, there is no consensus on the exposures that explain these outcomes, nor on the effectiveness of mental health interventions in this occupational group. This study aims to systematically review the literature on the mental health of UPT workers to assess the effects of occupational exposures and interventions. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed from 1990 to December 2021 in three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science). The included observational, experimental, intervention and qualitative studies were critically appraised and assessed for risk of bias. A narrative evidence synthesis was conducted by mental health outcomes, occupational exposures, and intervention categories. The database search yielded 1383 records. A total of 83 studies (49 cross-sectional, 8 longitudinal, 8 experiments, 7 interventions, and 11 qualitative) met the inclusion criteria. Bus drivers were the most studied population, followed by metro and train drivers. The included studies covered eleven mental health outcomes: sleep problems, fatigue and recovery needs, alcohol and substance use, PTSD, panic disorders, depression, anxiety, psychopathology symptoms, psychosomatic symptoms, and psychological stress. Work organization-related stressors (work content, workload and pace, working hours, participation and control, career development, status and salary, role in the organization, and interpersonal relationships) and occupational safety risks are the main predictors of negative mental health outcomes. Most intervention studies focus on the management of PTSD symptoms of UPT workers exposed to safety hazards. The results of this review contribute to the consensus on the antecedents of negative mental health outcomes among UPT workers, as well as to the identification of intervention targets and promising research lines for the development of this study field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it