Construction et déconstruction des mythes de fondation de l’Ouest américain au cinéma. Sur quatre plans iconiques du Western. <i>Stagecoach</i>, <i>The Ox-Bow Incident</i>, <i>The Searchers</i>, <i>Once Upon a Time in the West</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude cherche à saisir, à travers l’analyse de quatre plans extraits de quatre westerns différents, l’évolution syntaxique et historique d’un genre, de ses discours et de son idéologie, à travers l’apparente immuabilité de ses éléments sémantiques – narratifs, formels ou iconographiques. À partir de l’analyse comparative de quatre plans tirés de Stagecoach (Ford, 1939), de The Searchers (Ford, 1957), de The Ox-Bow Incident (Wellman, 1942) et de Once Upon a Time in the West (Leone, 1968), l’étude s’inscrit au confluent de plusieurs approches, aussi bien générique, formaliste que pragmatique. Elle part du genre et de certaines de ses conventions dramatiques et esthétiques pour déterminer, à travers les jeux parfois improbables, mais passionnants, de l’interprétation, son impact dans des contextes socioculturels déterminés et les modalités de ses transformations en fonction de ce que l’historiographie américaine a connu de modifications radicales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".