Construction et déconstruction des mythes de fondation de l’Ouest américain au cinéma. Sur quatre plans iconiques du Western. <i>Stagecoach</i>, <i>The Ox-Bow Incident</i>, <i>The Searchers</i>, <i>Once Upon a Time in the West</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude cherche à saisir, à travers l’analyse de quatre plans extraits de quatre westerns différents, l’évolution syntaxique et historique d’un genre, de ses discours et de son idéologie, à travers l’apparente immuabilité de ses éléments sémantiques – narratifs, formels ou iconographiques. À partir de l’analyse comparative de quatre plans tirés de Stagecoach (Ford, 1939), de The Searchers (Ford, 1957), de The Ox-Bow Incident (Wellman, 1942) et de Once Upon a Time in the West (Leone, 1968), l’étude s’inscrit au confluent de plusieurs approches, aussi bien générique, formaliste que pragmatique. Elle part du genre et de certaines de ses conventions dramatiques et esthétiques pour déterminer, à travers les jeux parfois improbables, mais passionnants, de l’interprétation, son impact dans des contextes socioculturels déterminés et les modalités de ses transformations en fonction de ce que l’historiographie américaine a connu de modifications radicales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".