MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395033821 · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1783517

Giardia-Associated Duodenal Stricture

2024· article· en· W4395033821 on OpenAlexaff
S. Malipatil, Kareem Khalaf, Mary Raina Angeli Fujiyoshi, Nicolas Calo, J. Mosko, Christopher Teshima, Gary R. May, Samir C. Grover

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGiardiaDuodenal DiseasesDuodenumGastroenterologyVeterinary medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Text A 71-year-old male was diagnosed with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) on immunoglobulin therapy.For several years he had mild intermittent chronic diarrhea.HIV,HLADQ2/DQ8, stool culture and Clostridoides difficile testing were negative.The second part of the duodenum revealed circumferential ulceration and cicatrization of the mucosa.Histopathology confirmed duodenal mucosa with subtotal villous blunting, architectural distortion,and moderate to severe acute inflammation,with copious Giardia lamblia trophozoites present.Giardia duodenalis is a common infection in individuals with CVID that can be associated with chronic inflammation leading to the complication of duodenal strictures. Video http://data.process.y-congress.com/ScientificProcess/Data//106/474/1197/9c691f51-302e-4bc0-a41e-b328439f33f2/Uploads/13821_CVID_Enteropathy.mp4 Publication History Article published online: 15 April 2024 © 2024. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicGastrointestinal disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207