Reproduction des ordres genrés dans les programmes de formations professionnelles des personnes réfugiées nigérianes au Cameroun
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En croisant le thème de l’humanitaire à celui de l’éducation, cet article propose une analyse centrée sur la reproduction des ordres genrés au sein des programmes de formation professionnelle proposés par les organisations humanitaires aux personnes réfugiées nigérianes du camp de Minawao au Cameroun. Ces ordres se matérialisent tant par des assignations des jeunes gens dans les filières dites traditionnellement féminines ou masculines que par des exclusions éducatives auxquelles ils sont confrontés. On peut donc légitimement se demander comment des organisations humanitaires, qui pourtant prônent l’égalité sociale et de genre, reproduisent des ordres genrés dans les programmes qu’elles mettent en œuvre ? À la lumière du gender mainstreaming , de la théorie de l’intersectionnalité et du concept d’ autonomie , combinés à une démarche statistique et ethnographique, cette recherche tente d’explorer les contradictions d’un secteur qui tend à reproduire des problématiques qu’il cherche pourtant à adresser.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".