MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 13643: Impact of Aortic Valve Repair and Valve-sparing Procedures on the Mitral Annular Geometry Assessed by 3-dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography

2015· article· en· W4395039493 on OpenAlexaff
M. Gabrielle Pagé, Maxime Laflamme, Christophe de Meester, Mihaela Amzulescu, Laurent de Kerchove, Gébrine El Khoury, Agnès Pasquet, Jean‐Louis Vanoverschelde

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyMitral valveAortic valveInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Annular non-planarity, the "saddle-shape" of the mitral valve (MV) annulus, plays a role in minimizing leaflet stress and preserving valve function. Aortic valve (AV) repair/sparing procedures are increasingly used to treat aortic regurgitation (AR). The impact of these procedures on MV geometry and function is unknown. Methods: 2D and 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) of the MV was acquired pre-operatively and immediately after surgery in 30 patients with severe AR and/or aortic root dilatation (Group 1 (n=10): bicuspid AV undergoing AV repair and valve-sparing root replacement with AV reimplantation; Group 2 (n=10): tricuspid AV undergoing AV repair and AV reimplantation; Group 3 (n=10): isolated AV cusp repair) and in 10 controls (Group 4). MV morphology was assessed by dedicated quantification software (fig. 1). Results: Comorbidities were similar in all groups. Groups 1, 2 and 3 had increased LV end-diastolic volumes compared to group 4 (214±90, 193±56, 180±55 vs. 86± 28ml for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively; p<0.001); LVEF was similar (59.5 ± 6.2%). The baseline dimensions of the ventriculo-aortic junction and sinuses of Valsalva were larger in groups 1 and 2 vs. groups 3 and 4 (p<0.0001). AV and MV parameters are summarized (table). Pre-operative MV parameters did not differ from those of normal subjects. The annular height and annular height to commissural width ratio (AHCWR) significantly decreased after surgery in groups 1 and 2, as did the tenting area. Significant changes in the coaptation depth and mitro-aortic angle were only found in group 1. Conclusions: AV repair/sparing procedures alter the MV geometry, including the non-planarity of the annulus and the depth of coaptation of the leaflets, especially among patients with a bicuspid AV undergoing AV reimplantation. These alterations could have long-term implications on MV function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→