MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395040301 · doi:10.1353/aca.2023.a925080

The Consolidation of the Rule of Law in the "New Dominion"

2023· article· en· W4395040301 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michael Boudreau

Bibliographic record

VenueAcadiensis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDominionConsolidation (business)LawPolitical scienceLaw and economicsSociologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Consolidation of the Rule of Law in the "New Dominion" Michael Boudreau (bio) ON 22 JULY 1904 GEORGE GEE WAS EXECUTED in Woodstock, New Brunswick, for the murder of his cousin Millie Gee. The question of Gee's guilt was not necessarily in question since he had confessed to the crime. Nineteen-year-old George Gee and eighteen-year-old Millie Gee had been "keeping company" and George had become "much attached" to Millie, so much so that he believed that they were husband and wife. But when Millie left George to live with her brother-in-law, Benny Gee, George Gee was "much aggrieved" by her desertion. Gee obtained a rifle and two bottles of rum and paid a visit to Benny Gee's home. Over the course of the evening, they drank and played cards. In the early hours of 13 March 1904, in Homesville, Carleton County, shots were heard echoing throughout the Gee residence. It was soon discovered that Millie Gee had been shot in the stomach, and she later died after doctors had operated on her in a desperate attempt to save her life. When George Gee was taken into custody by Deputy-Sheriff Albion Foster, he expressed little remorse for his actions and announced that the only thing he regretted was not shooting Millie Gee through the heart. The jury took 45 minutes to return with a guilty verdict. Upon hearing the jury's decision, George Gee smiled and quipped that it was "all he could expect." In passing sentence on Gee, the presiding judge, Chief Justice Tuck, stated that the jury's finding of guilt for this "fearful crime" was correct in light of the Crown's evidence. If Gee, or his defence counsel, clung to any hope that his death sentence would be commuted, Tuck quickly dashed their aspirations: "I can hold out no hope to you of pardon [for] this foul deed." And the dominion cabinet, in its review of the case, concurred with Tuck's recommendation that Gee's death sentence should be carried out.1 The fact that George Gee was executed should not come as a surprise. As the authors of the impressive A History of Law in Canada, Volume Two: Law for the New Dominion, 1867-1914 note, during this period New Brunswick (along with [End Page 78] British Columbia, the North-West Territories, and the Yukon), recorded more hangings than pardons.2 Gee's execution is a vivid example of the rule of law and "justice" in macabre action in the early decades of the "New Dominion" of Canada. Moreover, executions were a dramatic reminder to Canadians that the law, whether civil or criminal, permeated their lives. Indeed, as Jim Phillips, Philip Girard, and R. Blake Brown perceptively note, the law "was everywhere, as both derivative of political and social change and economic transformation, and as a contributor to them" (4). The law, in other words, became a potent symbol of the state's power and authority. Similarly, during the 1867 to 1914 period, as this book makes abundantly clear, the rule of law and the regulatory state were consolidated as a cornerstone of civil society. Phillips, Girard, and Brown are prodigious scholars in their own right, and their collaboration on this three-volume set of the history of law in Canada will further cement their reputations as being among the leading figures in Canadian legal history. Indeed, when the third volume is published (tentatively scheduled for 2025), all of these books – Volume One: Beginnings to 1866 (which appeared in 2019 and was reviewed in Acadiensis in 2020) and Volume Two: Law for the New Dominion (reviewed here) – will collectively make an indelible mark not only on the field of Canadian legal history but Canadian history generally.3 Relying primarily on secondary literature, legal decisions, federal and provincial statutes, and annual reports from government agencies, Law for the New Dominion explores Canada's three legal traditions (common law, civil law, and Indigenous law) along with the gradual marginalization of Indigenous law as "British justice," and the notion of the rule of law, solidified its prominence by the eve of the First World War. The authors also...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcadiensisSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207