MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4395040357 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2023.a925216

Class and Classrooms: Teaching Jane Eyre with Adele Grace and Celine

2023· article· en· W4395040357 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Margaret D. Stetz

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClass (philosophy)ArtArt historyVisual artsPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Class and Classrooms: Teaching Jane Eyre with Adele Grace and Celine Margaret D. Stetz (bio) In an influential 2019 essay, Carolyn Betensky calls on teachers of Victorian fiction to address seriously the racism in these texts—not only the examples of it that are pervasive and central to the narratives but also "racist references" that are fleeting and seemingly offhand (723). "Casual racism" of this sort, she writes, "abounds in Victorian novels," but this is no reason to treat it casually in our pedagogy (724). Especially for students of colour, who are subjected to being "treated as a racial other" in their daily lives, seeing "casual Victorian racism" accepted in the classroom "as merely routine without further discussion amounts here to an act of aggression" (736). At the same time, such a lack of attention signals to white students that merely noting the presence of historical racism is sufficient, without considering its relevance to their own lives and its continuing power in shaping current-day attitudes. If it is up to us as faculty members to deal responsibly with casually racist moments in Victorian texts, then it is even more urgent to confront racism in novels where it functions as a crucial structural element. For decades, many of us who teach a canonical work such as Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre (1847) have tried to do this by assigning Jean Rhys's Wide Sargasso Sea (1966) alongside it, as I do in Jane Eyre and Its Legacies, an undergraduate course crosslisted at the University of Delaware between the Department of English and the Department of Women & Gender Studies. As Carine Mardorossian writes in "#Metoo in Wide Sargasso Sea," Rhys's account of the early life in the Caribbean of the fictional Bertha Rochester, the so-called Madwoman in the Attic, "makes visible the inseparable workings of racialized and gendered oppression in the colonial context" (146). To second Andrea Kaston Tange that a "feminist reading of Jane Eyre today must necessarily be a post-colonial one" (46) is to appreciate the capacity of Rhys's narrative to help students comprehend that necessity in a visceral and memorable way. Wide Sargasso Sea encourages readers not merely to recognize "Rochester's and Jane's . . . blindness . . . [to their] privileges of race and colonial domination" in Brontë's novel but also to consider their own racial blind-spots (Tange 46–47). At the same time, it should be obvious that one such fictional text is not enough. To foreground race and racism not only in Jane Eyre but also in other times and contexts, the reading list for my Legacies course has included, over the years, a number of Jane Eyre-influenced novels by women of colour, such as Simi Bedford's Yoruba Girl Dancing (1991), Helen Oyeyemi's The Icarus Girl (2005), and Patricia Park's Re Jane (2015). I also have the students watch Sandra Goldbacher's 1998 neo-Victorian film, The Governess, about a young [End Page 40] Sephardic Jewish woman confronting nineteenth-century anti-Semitism, in order to counter the assumption that everyone in Jane Eyre's Britain would have been an Anglo-Saxon Christian (and, of course, to encourage them to think about anti-Semitism today, on both sides of the Atlantic). None of these splendid works, however, does enough to raise awareness about another troubling issue—that is, the casual classism that masks the importance throughout Jane Eyre of working-class women, while effacing their personalities and erasing the stories of their lives. For American students, in particular, class consciousness is often a little-explored matter. Regardless of their race or ethnicity, few of the middle-, lower-middle-, or even working-class undergraduates whom I teach express any interest in or concern about the many servant characters who populate Brontë's fictional landscape, let alone about the women like Céline Varens (or the Italian "Giacinta" or the German "Clara") for whose sexual services Rochester paid and who feature in the history of his earlier amatory exploits that he shares with Jane. For their lack of curiosity about those at the bottom of the Victorian class system, my students are not to blame. They are guided by Jane...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0180.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian review→Same topicIrish and British Studies→French-language works237,207→