Maternité et haut potentiel : résultats d’une étude qualitative exploratoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À ce jour, il n’existe pas de définition du haut potentiel qui fasse unanimité au plan scientifique (Caron et al. , 2021). Ce phénomène est malgré tout associé à de nombreuses répercussions psychologiques, sociales et scolaires chez les enfants concernés (Loureiro et al. , 2010 ; Siaud-Facchin, 2010). Le vécu des parents qui vivent avec un enfant à haut potentiel demeure toutefois peu documenté. Cet article s’intéresse au vécu de 12 mères d’enfants à haut potentiel. Il met en évidence les conséquences de cette condition sur leur vie personnelle, familiale et financière. Les résultats de l’étude mettent de l’avant l’importance de soutenir les mères d’enfants identifiés comme étant à haut potentiel, puisque certaines d’entre-elles doivent composer avec des défis supplémentaires dans leur rôle parental (Deborah, 2006).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".