Designing a Real-Time Implementable Optimal Adaptive Cruise Control for Improving Battery Health and Energy Consumption in EVs through V2V Communication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) face challenges like their limited all-electric range, the discrepancy between promised and actual energy efficiency, and battery health degradation, despite their environmental benefits. This article proposes an optimal adaptive cruise control (OACC) framework by leveraging ideal vehicle-to-vehicle communication to address these challenges. In a connected vehicle environment, where it is assumed that the Ego vehicle’s vehicle control unit (VCU) accurately knows the speed and position of the Leading vehicle, the VCU can optimally plan the acceleration trajectory for a short-term future time window through a model predictive control (MPC) framework tailored to BEVs. The primary objective of the OACC is to reduce the energy consumption and battery state-of-health degradation of a BEV. The Chevrolet Spark 2015 is chosen as the BEV platform used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed OACC. Simulations conducted under urban and highway driving conditions, as well as under communication delay and infused noise, resulted in up to a 3.7% reduction in energy consumption and a 9.7% reduction in battery state-of-health (SOH) degradation, demonstrating the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed OACC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".