MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395052744 · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1782980

Delayed bleeding post-endoscopic ampullectomy for ampullary adenomas: Incidence, risk factors and management

2024· article· en· W4395052744 on OpenAlexaff
Katarzyna M. Pawlak, Samir Gupta, Kareem Khalaf, Daniel Tham, W. James Chon, J. Mosko, Christopher Teshima, Gary R. May, Nicolas Calo

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMajor duodenal papillaIncidence (geometry)LesionGastroenterologyEndoscopyArgon plasma coagulationInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims The duodenal tumors of major papilla account 10% of all peri-ampullary lesions [1]. Endoscopic ampullectomy became the treatment modality for selected cases. Despite the significantly lower rate of adverse events, bleeding occurs in up to 25% of patients [2]. The rate of bleeding may be even higher, depending on periampullary lesion size and type. Factors related to delayed bleeding are poorly understood. Our study aimed to determine predicting factors for delayed post-ampullectomy bleeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207