Higher Plasma Omega-3 Levels are Associated With Improved Exacerbation Risk and Respiratory-Specific Quality of Life in COPD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have been associated with systemic anti-inflammatory responses. Dietary intake of omega-3 PUFAs eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has also been associated with lower chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) morbidity using self-report food frequency questionnaires. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between measured PUFA intake using plasma EPA+DHA levels and COPD morbidity. Methods: Former smokers with moderate-to-severe COPD living in low-income communities were enrolled in a 6-month prospective cohort study. Participants completed standardized questionnaires, spirometry, and plasma samples at 3-month intervals. Total plasma PUFAs were analyzed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for DHA and EPA concentrations. Linear or logistic mixed model regression was used to evaluate EPA+DHA's and COPD morbidity's association, accounting for demographics, lung function, pack years, comorbidities, and neighborhood poverty. Results: A total of 133 plasma EPA+DHA samples from 57 participants were available. Participants exhibited average plasma EPA and DHA levels of 14.7±7.3µg/mL and 40.2±17.2µg/mL, respectively, across the 3 clinic visits. Each standard deviation increase in EPA+DHA levels was associated with 2.7 points lower St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.2, -0.2) and lower odds of moderate exacerbation (odds ratio 0.4; 95% CI 0.2, 0.9), but lacked significant association with the COPD Assessment Test score (95% CI -2.4, 0.8), modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (95% CI -02, 0.2), or severe exacerbations (95% CI 0.3, 1.4). Conclusion: Plasma EPA+DHA levels are associated with better respiratory-specific quality of life and lower odds of moderate exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Further research is warranted to investigate the efficacy of an omega-3 dietary intervention in the management of COPD morbidities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".