MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4395056109 · doi:10.33424/futurum489

Navigating the maze of reading comprehension for first grade learners

2024· article· en· W4395056109 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Marie-France Côté

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReading comprehensionReading (process)ComprehensionPsychologyMathematics educationComputer scienceLinguisticsProgramming languagePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

studies the complexities of reading comprehension among first grade French-speaking learners in Quebec.She is looking at the difficulties in assessing these early years students and working on a new and more reliable assessment tool called ESPACE. Navigating the maze of reading comprehension for first grade learners Language didacticsAnaphora -the use of a word referring to a word used earlier (or, sometimes, later) in a text to avoid repetition (e.g., the pronouns he, she, it and they)Cognitive load -the amount of cognitive resource (such as working memory) required to perform a task Explicit -when meaning is stated clearly Grapheme -a written symbol of a phoneme (sound).This could be a single letter (such as 'e' in 'egg') or combination of letters (such as 'ee' in knee') Implicit -when meaning is implied, rather than stated directly, and has to be inferred Inference -drawing conclusions or making educated guesses based on information provided in the text and one's own background knowledge Phoneme -smallest unit of sound in a given language Reading comprehension -understanding the meaning of written text, including explicit and implicit information

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReading and Literacy Development→French-language works237,207→