Bibliographic record
Abstract
En l’espace d’une génération (1980-2020), les sociétés française et québécoise ont connu des transformations profondes. Les relations entre Français et Québécois, elles, n’ont pas changé dans les mêmes proportions. Le monde du travail constitue à cet égard le meilleur des terrains d’observation. La vie des entreprises françaises et québécoises continue de s’organiser différemment quand bien même leur environnement se modifie en permanence. Les auteurs, un Français et un Québécois, ont recueilli tout au long de cette période les témoignages de Français venus travailler au Québec, et ceux de Québécois venus travailler en France. Ils ont aussi interrogé les immigrants d’autres pays qui y sont employés, ainsi que les salariés français d’une usine de Nouvelle-Calédonie gérée par des Québécois. S’appuyant sur cette collection particulièrement riche de données de terrain, ils analysent ensemble ce qui, d’une façon remarquablement pérenne, sépare et réunit ces cousins éloignés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".