MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395059552 · doi:10.29173/alr2676

Prompt Payment Movement Sweeps Across Canada: Is the Energy Industry Ready to Comply?

2021· article· en· W4395059552 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Paula Olexiuk, Melanie Gaston, Jagriti Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Law Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy Efficiency and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaymentMovement (music)BusinessEnergy (signal processing)Energy lawFinanceLawPolitical scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jurisdictions throughout Canada are debating, drafting, and enacting legislation for prompt payment and mandatory adjudication in the construction industry. The purpose of such legislation is to avoid the pitfalls of delayed payments and improve the dispute settlement system. Although this legislative push is inspired by reforms undertaken in the UK decades ago, Canadian jurisdictions are now following Ontario’s lead in legislating swift payment deadlines and adjudication requirements. This article surveys these legislative changes as they first occurred in the UK context and as they are now occurring throughout Canada. Special attention is given to implications for the Canadian energy sector. The article concludes by offering some risk allocation strategies for drafting contracts under the new statutory requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Law ReviewSame topicEnergy Efficiency and ManagementFrench-language works237,207