A Rare Prolactin-secreting Pituitary Carcinoma With Epidural and Thecal Metastases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pituitary carcinomas are rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality. They remain challenging to diagnose and manage. In this case, we describe a 56-year-old man who presented with erectile dysfunction and binocular vertical diplopia. He had central hypogonadism, secondary adrenal insufficiency, and central hypothyroidism on biochemical testing. His serum prolactin was 1517 mcg/L (1517 ng/mL; reference range 4-15 mcg/L), and his sellar magnetic resonance imaging showed a 2.0 × 2.2 × 3.1 cm pituitary tumor. Pathology revealed a prolactin-secreting carcinoma. Despite treatment with a high-dose dopaminergic, 2 transsphenoidal resections, and 1 course of radiation, prolactin levels continued to rise. He developed metastases to the epidural space and thecal sac from the thoracic to sacral spine, for which he received 12 cycles of temozolomide chemotherapy with initial clinical and biochemical response. This was followed by disease escape and progression. We discuss the clinical and imaging features that warrant a high index of suspicion for pituitary carcinoma and review contemporary treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".