Evaluation of the Sustainability of Sugarcane Expansion in the State of Goiás
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The expansion of sugarcane cultivation, and the development and modernization of the sugarcane sector, have contributed to the strengthening of Brazilian agribusiness, thereby contributing to the growth of the country's economy. Thus, it is necessary to adapt agricultural or agro-industrial activities so that the entire productive system has a positive impact on the environment and society. In this sense, the objective was to evaluate the sustainability of the expansion of sugarcane cultivation in the State of Goiás. The methodology was based on the application of the Sustainability Barometer-SB Method. Thus, subsidies were provided to create a portrait of the sustainability of the expansion of the culture in the state. The results indicated that the sector occupies a medium/intermediate position in relation to Sustainability according to SB. We conclude that the method has the potential to be an important tool in assessing the sustainability of the sugar-energy sector in Goiás.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it