Cure Shrinkage Stress Analysis of Ultraviolet Curable Adhesive by Viscoelastic Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A user subroutine has been ingeniously developed and integrated into the general FEM code ANSYS, dedicated to the evaluation of cure shrinkage stress in UV curable adhesives. Through experimentation, the user subroutine has exhibited exceptional accuracy in computing the relaxation behavior for varying degrees of cure. Moreover, an analysis employing dynamic mechanical analysis has convincingly demonstrated the ability of user subroutine to adeptly capture the intricate interplay between curing degree and frequency, manifesting as phase differences between displacement and stress. Finally, an analysis assuming curing shrinkage was performed. The results proved to be exceptionally encouraging, as the subroutine aptly reproduced the characteristic dependency of illuminance and film thickness on curing stress, which is notably distinctive to UV adhesives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.019 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it