MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395067658 · doi:10.1088/1361-6595/ad42d0

Combined ns pulsed-RF excitation and impedance matching considerations for the production of moderate E/n atmospheric pressure discharges for gas conversion

2024· article· en· W4395067658 on OpenAlexafffund
Dante Filice, Sylvain Coulombe

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Sources Science and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlasma Applications and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAtmospheric pressureExcitationElectrical impedanceAtomic physicsProduction (economics)Impedance matchingMatching (statistics)Materials scienceChemistryPhysicsElectrical engineeringMeteorologyEngineeringMathematicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sub-breakdown radiofrequency (RF) discharges enabled by a nanosecond (ns) pulse ignition source are studied at atmospheric pressure in a range of gas mixtures from completely inert (in Ar) to completely reactive (in CO2). An electrical characterisation of the continuous wave (CW) RF discharge (13.56 MHz) is performed to determine plasma impedance and plasma power dissipation. Two different measurement methods to electrically characterize the system are described and compared. One method uses in-situ measurements of discharge parameters (voltage, current and the phase angle), and the other method performs ex-situ measurements of the load circuit using a vector network analyser. It was found that RF plasma power deposition depended on the applied RF power as well as the gas mixture composition. Using the in-situ voltage, current and phase angle measurements, plasma power deposition was calculated to be as much as 85% and 76% of the applied RF power for the pure Ar and pure CO2 cases, respectively. A preliminary qualitative assessment of the plasma composition was performed by optical emission spectroscopy, and CO2 conversion by mass spectrometry. CO2 to CO conversions of 11.2% and 5.5% in a 20:80 (CO2:Ar) mixture and in 100% CO2, respectively, were observed. This study demonstrates a RF plasma source for gas conversion applications at atmospheric pressure in a completely reactive gas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlasma Sources Science and TechnologySame topicPlasma Applications and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207