The heme binding protein ChuX is a regulator of heme degradation by the ChuS protein in Escherichia coli O157:H7
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Escherichia coli O157:H7 possesses an 8-gene cluster (chu genes) that contains genes involved in heme transport and processing from the human host. Among the chu genes, four encode cytoplasmic proteins (ChuS, ChuX, ChuY and ChuW). ChuX was previously shown to be a heme binding protein and to assist ChuW in heme degradation under anaerobic conditions. The purpose of this work was to investigate if ChuX works in concert with ChuS, which is a protein able to degrade heme by a non-canonical mechanism and release the iron from the porphyrin under aerobic conditions using hydrogen peroxide as the oxidant. We showed that when the heme-bound ChuX and apo-ChuS protein are mixed, heme is efficiently transferred from ChuX to ChuS. Heme-bound ChuX displayed a peroxidase activity with ABTS and H2O2 but not heme-bound ChuS, which is an efficient test to determine the protein to which heme is bound in the ChuS-ChuX complex. We found that ChuX protects heme from chemical oxidation and that it has no heme degradation activity by itself. Unexpectedly, we found that ChuX inhibits heme degradation by ChuS and stops the reaction at an early intermediate. We determined using surface plasmon resonance that ChuX interacts with ChuS and that it forms a relatively stable complex. These results indicate that ChuX in addition to its heme transfer activity is a regulator of ChuS activity, a function that was not described before for any of the heme carrier protein that delivers heme to heme degradation enzymes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".