MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395071178 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02199

Selective Tautomer Production and Cryogenic Ion Spectroscopy of Radical Cations: The Uracil and Thymine Cases

2024· article· en· W4395071178 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Franco Molina, Michel Broquier, Satchin Soorkia, Gilles Grégoire, Gustavo A. Pino

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Nautical Research SocietyFondo para la Investigación Científica y TecnológicaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología e InnovaciónConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación ProductivaSecretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología - Universidad Nacional de CórdobaAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsThymineUracilPhotodissociationPhotochemistryChemistryTautomerSpectroscopyNucleobaseIonRadical ionMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The vibrational and electronic spectroscopy of the radical cations of two nucleobases (NB) (uracil and thymine) was studied by cryogenic ion photodissociation spectroscopy. The radical cations have been generated from the photodissociation of NB–Ag + complexes. A charge transfer process from the NB to Ag + governs the deactivation mechanism, leading to the formation of the radical cation without further tautomerization. Single- and double-resonance spectroscopy allows for structural assignments of both the silver complexes and the radical cations by comparison with DFT-based calculations. Interestingly, a tautomer-dependent fragmentation is observed in the thymine enol form that involves the loss of NCO, a fragment which was never reported before for this NB. This selective photodissociation of silver complexes containing aromatic chromophore greatly expands the current technique to produce isomer-selected radical cations in the gas phase providing benchmark experimental data to assess calculations of open-shell species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207