Agenesia de la vesícula biliar: una serie de casos multicéntrica y revisión de la literatura
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atribucin -Permite copiar, distribuir y comunicar pblicamente la obra.A cambio se debe reconocer y citar al autor original.No Comercial -Esta obra no puede ser utilizada con finalidades comerciales, a menos que se obtenga el permiso.Sin Obra Derivada -Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado. RESUMENLa agenesia de la vescula biliar es una entidad rara en pediatra con una evolucin normalmente silente, y representa un desafo diagnstico para el mdico que enfrenta estos casos por primera vez.Algunos pacientes pueden, sin embargo, presentar sntomas que simulan otras patologas del rbol biliar, y muchos de ellos son operados ante esta sospecha.Sin embargo, el diagnstico oportuno de esta entidad permite llevar a cabo un tratamiento mdico que muchas veces es suficiente para resolver el problema del paciente.Si bien es una condicin benigna, los pacientes suelen presentar otras malformaciones asociadas que son ms graves en naturaleza y que deben investigarse activamente para poder derivarlos a los especialistas de manera oportuna.Presentamos nuestra experiencia en el diagnstico y tratamiento de estos pacientes, as como una breve revisin de la literatura.Esperamos que sea de utilidad para el mdico que encuentre un caso similar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".